{"id":32644,"date":"2022-08-19T17:03:02","date_gmt":"2022-08-19T20:03:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/datamarnews.com\/?post_type=noticias&p=32644"},"modified":"2022-08-22T18:19:09","modified_gmt":"2022-08-22T21:19:09","slug":"ranking-dos-portos-dataliner-jan-jun-2022-a-jan-jun-2021-brasil-e-plate","status":"publish","type":"noticias","link":"https:\/\/datamarnews.com\/pt\/noticias\/ranking-dos-portos-dataliner-jan-jun-2022-a-jan-jun-2021-brasil-e-plate\/","title":{"rendered":"Ranking dos Portos | DataLiner | Jan-Jun 2022 a Jan-Jun 2021 Brasil e Plate"},"content":{"rendered":"

Confira a seguir o ranking dos portos brasileiros e do Plate que mais exportaram e importaram cont\u00eaineres nos primeiros seis meses de 2022 e seu comparativo com igual per\u00edodo de 2021. Os dados s\u00e3o do DataLiner:<\/p>\n

Brasil<\/strong><\/p>\n

O Porto de Santos foi o que mais realizou opera\u00e7\u00f5es de exporta\u00e7\u00e3o de cont\u00eaineres no primeiro semestre de 2022, com 555.892 TEUs, volume em linha com o exportado no mesmo per\u00edodo de 2021. O segundo colocado do ranking, Paranagu\u00e1, exportou um volume 11,19% maior no mesmo comparativo. Confira a seguir:<\/p>\n

Ranking dos Portos Brasileiros | Exporta\u00e7\u00f5es | Jan\/Jun 2021 vs Jan\/Jun 2022 | TEU\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n wdt_ID<\/th> Rank<\/th> Portos<\/th> Jan-Jun | 2021<\/th> Jan-Jun | 2022<\/th> % Mudan\u00e7a<\/th> <\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
1<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n SANTOS<\/td>\n 560.960<\/td>\n 555.892<\/td>\n -0.90%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n PARANAGUA<\/td>\n 184.672<\/td>\n 205.329<\/td>\n 11.19%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n NAVEGANTES<\/td>\n 184.992<\/td>\n 196.098<\/td>\n 6.00%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n ITAPOA<\/td>\n 88.910<\/td>\n 105.170<\/td>\n 18.29%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n RIO GRANDE<\/td>\n 109.741<\/td>\n 84.849<\/td>\n -22.68%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n RIO DE JANEIRO<\/td>\n 44.015<\/td>\n 44.171<\/td>\n 0.35%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n ITAJAI<\/td>\n 72.647<\/td>\n 44.115<\/td>\n -39.27%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\n 8<\/td>\n SALVADOR<\/td>\n 40.729<\/td>\n 36.977<\/td>\n -9.21%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n VILA DO CONDE<\/td>\n 29.053<\/td>\n 27.294<\/td>\n -6.06%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\n 10<\/td>\n VITORIA<\/td>\n 33.494<\/td>\n 25.029<\/td>\n -25.27%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\n 11<\/td>\n PECEM<\/td>\n 14.389<\/td>\n 14.325<\/td>\n -0.44%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\n 12<\/td>\n FORTALEZA<\/td>\n 15.321<\/td>\n 12.496<\/td>\n -18.44%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\n 13<\/td>\n SUAPE<\/td>\n 13.839<\/td>\n 12.295<\/td>\n -11.16%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\n 14<\/td>\n MANAUS<\/td>\n 8.799<\/td>\n 8.986<\/td>\n 2.12%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\n 15<\/td>\n ITAGUAI<\/td>\n 12.950<\/td>\n 8.153<\/td>\n -37.04%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\n 16<\/td>\n NATAL<\/td>\n 7.551<\/td>\n 7.712<\/td>\n 2.13%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\n <\/td>\n OUTROS<\/td>\n 438<\/td>\n 361<\/td>\n -17.58%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\n <\/td>\n TOTAL<\/td>\n 1.422.501<\/td>\n 1.389.253<\/td>\n -2.34%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody> \n\n \n \n \n <\/table>\n\n<\/div>