{"id":32648,"date":"2022-08-19T17:03:38","date_gmt":"2022-08-19T20:03:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/datamarnews.com\/?post_type=noticias&p=32648"},"modified":"2022-08-22T18:19:05","modified_gmt":"2022-08-22T21:19:05","slug":"port-ranking-dataliner-jan-jun-2022-vs-jan-jun-2021-brazil-and-plate","status":"publish","type":"noticias","link":"https:\/\/datamarnews.com\/noticias\/port-ranking-dataliner-jan-jun-2022-vs-jan-jun-2021-brazil-and-plate\/","title":{"rendered":"Port Ranking | DataLiner | Jan-Jun 2022 vs. Jan-Jun 2021 | Brazil and Plate"},"content":{"rendered":"

See below the ports ranking in Brazil and the Plate region in terms of exports and imports of containers in the first half of 2022 versus the same period in 2021. The data are from DataLiner.<\/p>\n

Brazil<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Port of Santos was the one with the most exports of containers in the first half of 2022, with 555,892 TEUs, a volume in line with exports in the same period of 2021. The second place in the ranking, Paranagu\u00e1, exported a volume 11.19 % higher in comparison. See more of it below:<\/p>\n

Brazilian Ports Ranking | Exports | Jan\/Jun 2021 vs. Jan\/Jun 2022 | TEU<\/strong><\/h4>\n

\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n wdt_ID<\/th> Rank<\/th> Ports<\/th> Jan-Jun | 2021<\/th> Jan-Jun | 2022<\/th> % Change<\/th> <\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
1<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n SANTOS<\/td>\n 560.960<\/td>\n 555.892<\/td>\n -0.90%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n PARANAGUA<\/td>\n 184.672<\/td>\n 205.329<\/td>\n 11.19%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n NAVEGANTES<\/td>\n 184.992<\/td>\n 196.098<\/td>\n 6.00%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n ITAPOA<\/td>\n 88.910<\/td>\n 105.170<\/td>\n 18.29%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n RIO GRANDE<\/td>\n 109.741<\/td>\n 84.849<\/td>\n -22.68%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n RIO DE JANEIRO<\/td>\n 44.015<\/td>\n 44.171<\/td>\n 0.35%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n ITAJAI<\/td>\n 72.647<\/td>\n 44.115<\/td>\n -39.27%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\n 8<\/td>\n SALVADOR<\/td>\n 40.729<\/td>\n 36.977<\/td>\n -9.21%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n VILA DO CONDE<\/td>\n 29.053<\/td>\n 27.294<\/td>\n -6.06%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\n 10<\/td>\n VITORIA<\/td>\n 33.494<\/td>\n 25.029<\/td>\n -25.27%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\n 11<\/td>\n PECEM<\/td>\n 14.389<\/td>\n 14.325<\/td>\n -0.44%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\n 12<\/td>\n FORTALEZA<\/td>\n 15.321<\/td>\n 12.496<\/td>\n -18.44%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\n 13<\/td>\n SUAPE<\/td>\n 13.839<\/td>\n 12.295<\/td>\n -11.16%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\n 14<\/td>\n MANAUS<\/td>\n 8.799<\/td>\n 8.986<\/td>\n 2.12%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\n 15<\/td>\n ITAGUAI<\/td>\n 12.950<\/td>\n 8.153<\/td>\n -37.04%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\n 16<\/td>\n NATAL<\/td>\n 7.551<\/td>\n 7.712<\/td>\n 2.13%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\n <\/td>\n OTHERS<\/td>\n 438<\/td>\n 361<\/td>\n -17.58%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\n <\/td>\n TOTAL<\/td>\n 1.422.501<\/td>\n 1.389.253<\/td>\n -2.34%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody> \n\n \n \n \n <\/table>\n\n<\/div>