{"id":34645,"date":"2022-10-26T17:59:03","date_gmt":"2022-10-26T20:59:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/datamarnews.com\/?post_type=noticias&p=34645"},"modified":"2022-10-31T16:49:17","modified_gmt":"2022-10-31T19:49:17","slug":"ranking-of-ports-jan-aug-2022-to-jan-aug-2021-brazil-and-plate","status":"publish","type":"noticias","link":"https:\/\/datamarnews.com\/noticias\/ranking-of-ports-jan-aug-2022-to-jan-aug-2021-brazil-and-plate\/","title":{"rendered":"Ranking of Ports | Jan-Aug 2022 to Jan-Aug 2021 | Brazil and Plate"},"content":{"rendered":"

See below the ranking of Brazilian and Plate ports that most exported and imported containers in the first eight months of 2022 and its comparison to the same period in 2021. The data are from DataLiner.<\/p>\n

Brazil<\/strong><\/h4>\n

The Port of Santos maintained its top spot in the ranking of container exports in the first eight months of 2022, with 741,665 TEU, a slight decline of 0.57% from the volumes exported in the same period of 2021. In the same period, Paranagu\u00e1 and Navegantes, who were ranked second and third, respectively, both experienced growth of 5%. See the others below:<\/p>\n

Ranking of Brazilian Ports | Exports | Jan\/Aug 2021 vs. Jan\/Aug 2022 | TEU<\/span><\/strong><\/h4>\n

\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n wdt_ID<\/th> Rank<\/th> Ports<\/th> Jan-Aug | 2021<\/th> Jan-Aug | 2022<\/th> % Change<\/th> <\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
1<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n SANTOS<\/td>\n 745.940<\/td>\n 741.665<\/td>\n -0.57%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n PARANAGUA<\/td>\n 260.562<\/td>\n 275.437<\/td>\n 5.71%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n NAVEGANTES<\/td>\n 249.641<\/td>\n 262.127<\/td>\n 5.00%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n ITAPOA<\/td>\n 120.923<\/td>\n 144.121<\/td>\n 19.18%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n RIO GRANDE<\/td>\n 145.193<\/td>\n 111.744<\/td>\n -23.04%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n ITAJAI<\/td>\n 97.199<\/td>\n 59.549<\/td>\n -38.73%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n RIO DE JANEIRO<\/td>\n 58.039<\/td>\n 57.329<\/td>\n -1.22%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\n 8<\/td>\n SALVADOR<\/td>\n 53.790<\/td>\n 46.513<\/td>\n -13.53%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n VILA DO CONDE<\/td>\n 39.561<\/td>\n 35.691<\/td>\n -9.78%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\n 10<\/td>\n VITORIA<\/td>\n 46.596<\/td>\n 34.323<\/td>\n -26.34%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\n 11<\/td>\n PECEM<\/td>\n 19.697<\/td>\n 17.728<\/td>\n -10.00%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\n 12<\/td>\n FORTALEZA<\/td>\n 17.898<\/td>\n 15.204<\/td>\n -15.05%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\n 13<\/td>\n SUAPE<\/td>\n 19.170<\/td>\n 14.686<\/td>\n -23.39%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\n 14<\/td>\n MANAUS<\/td>\n 11.538<\/td>\n 11.076<\/td>\n -4.00%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\n 15<\/td>\n ITAGUAI<\/td>\n 16.934<\/td>\n 10.182<\/td>\n -39.87%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\n 16<\/td>\n NATAL<\/td>\n 10.621<\/td>\n 9.755<\/td>\n -8.15%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\n <\/td>\n OTHERS<\/td>\n 620<\/td>\n 447<\/td>\n -27.90%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\n <\/td>\n TOTAL<\/td>\n 1.913.923<\/td>\n 1.847.578<\/td>\n -3.47%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody> \n\n \n \n \n <\/table>\n\n<\/div>