{"id":35503,"date":"2022-11-24T14:45:26","date_gmt":"2022-11-24T17:45:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/datamarnews.com\/?post_type=noticias&p=35503"},"modified":"2022-12-01T16:16:33","modified_gmt":"2022-12-01T19:16:33","slug":"ranking-of-ports-dataliner-jan-sep-2022-vs-jan-sep-2021-brazil-and-plate","status":"publish","type":"noticias","link":"https:\/\/datamarnews.com\/noticias\/ranking-of-ports-dataliner-jan-sep-2022-vs-jan-sep-2021-brazil-and-plate\/","title":{"rendered":"Ranking of Ports | DataLiner | Jan-Sep 2022 vs. Jan-Sep 2021 | Brazil and Plate"},"content":{"rendered":"

Please see below the ranking of ports in Brazil and the Plate region that most exported and imported containers in the first nine months of 2022 vis-a-vis the same period in 2021. All data come from DataLiner.<\/p>\n

Brazil<\/strong><\/h4>\n

The Port of Santos<\/a> leads the ranking of Brazilian containerized exports, with 851,005 TEUs from January to September 2022, a slight increase of 1.19% compared to the same period in 2021. The Port of Paranagu\u00e1, second in the ranking, exported a volume 5.08% higher in the same comparative frame. The Port of Itapo\u00e1 ranked fourth, growing 18.71%. See more below:<\/p>\n

\u202fRanking of Brazilian Ports | Exports | Jan\/Sep 2021 vs. Jan\/ Sep 2022 | TEU<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n wdt_ID<\/th> Rank<\/th> Ports<\/th> Jan-Sep | 2021<\/th> Jan-Sep | 2022<\/th> % Change<\/th> <\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
1<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n SANTOS<\/td>\n 841.036<\/td>\n 851.005<\/td>\n 1.19%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n PARANAGUA<\/td>\n 294.041<\/td>\n 308.972<\/td>\n 5.08%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n NAVEGANTES<\/td>\n 285.850<\/td>\n 291.473<\/td>\n 1.97%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n ITAPOA<\/td>\n 137.445<\/td>\n 163.160<\/td>\n 18.71%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n RIO GRANDE<\/td>\n 160.259<\/td>\n 125.471<\/td>\n -21.71%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n ITAJAI<\/td>\n 107.281<\/td>\n 65.756<\/td>\n -38.71%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n RIO DE JANEIRO<\/td>\n 64.573<\/td>\n 64.395<\/td>\n -0.28%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\n 8<\/td>\n SALVADOR<\/td>\n 60.962<\/td>\n 56.167<\/td>\n -7.86%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n VILA DO CONDE<\/td>\n 43.083<\/td>\n 39.870<\/td>\n -7.46%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\n 10<\/td>\n VITORIA<\/td>\n 52.899<\/td>\n 39.028<\/td>\n -26.22%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\n 11<\/td>\n PECEM<\/td>\n 25.644<\/td>\n 21.570<\/td>\n -15.89%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\n 12<\/td>\n FORTALEZA<\/td>\n 19.288<\/td>\n 17.274<\/td>\n -10.44%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\n 13<\/td>\n SUAPE<\/td>\n 21.116<\/td>\n 16.059<\/td>\n -23.95%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\n 14<\/td>\n MANAUS<\/td>\n 13.021<\/td>\n 12.653<\/td>\n -2.83%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\n 15<\/td>\n NATAL<\/td>\n 14.240<\/td>\n 12.350<\/td>\n -13.27%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\n 16<\/td>\n ITAGUAI<\/td>\n 19.208<\/td>\n 12.004<\/td>\n -37.51%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\n <\/td>\n OTHERS<\/td>\n 677<\/td>\n 493<\/td>\n -27.18%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\n <\/td>\n TOTAL<\/td>\n 2.160.623<\/td>\n 2.097.701<\/td>\n -2.91%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody> \n\n \n \n \n <\/table>\n\n<\/div>