{"id":36454,"date":"2022-12-27T17:59:46","date_gmt":"2022-12-27T20:59:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/datamarnews.com\/?post_type=noticias&p=36454"},"modified":"2023-01-02T17:46:49","modified_gmt":"2023-01-02T20:46:49","slug":"ranking-of-ports-dataliner-jan-oct-2022-vs-jan-oct-2021-brazil-and-plate","status":"publish","type":"noticias","link":"https:\/\/datamarnews.com\/noticias\/ranking-of-ports-dataliner-jan-oct-2022-vs-jan-oct-2021-brazil-and-plate\/","title":{"rendered":"Ranking of Ports | DataLiner | Jan-Oct 2022 vs. Jan-Oct 2021 | Brazil and Plate"},"content":{"rendered":"

See below the ranking of Brazilian and Plate ports that most exported and imported containers in the first ten months of 2022 compared with the same period of 2021. The data is from DataLiner:<\/p>\n

Brazil<\/strong><\/h4>\n

The Port of Santos leads the ranking of Brazilian exports via containers<\/a>, with 957,067 TEUs moved between January and October 2022, an increase of 2.13% compared to the same period in 2021. The Port of Paranagua, second in the ranking, saw a volume 4.45% higher in the same time frame. See the others below:<\/p>\n

Ranking of Brazilian Ports | Exports | Jan\/Oct 2021 vs. Jan\/ Oct 2022 | TEU<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n wdt_ID<\/th> Rank<\/th> Ports<\/th> Jan-Oct | 2021<\/th> Jan-Oct | 2022<\/th> % Change<\/th> <\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
1<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n SANTOS<\/td>\n 937.124<\/td>\n 957.067<\/td>\n 2.13%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n PARANAGUA<\/td>\n 325.218<\/td>\n 339.704<\/td>\n 4.45%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n NAVEGANTES<\/td>\n 319.727<\/td>\n 317.586<\/td>\n -0.67%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n ITAPOA<\/td>\n 154.751<\/td>\n 180.024<\/td>\n 16.33%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n RIO GRANDE<\/td>\n 178.552<\/td>\n 139.611<\/td>\n -21.81%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n ITAJAI<\/td>\n 115.923<\/td>\n 73.788<\/td>\n -36.35%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n RIO DE JANEIRO<\/td>\n 71.466<\/td>\n 72.003<\/td>\n 0.75%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\n 8<\/td>\n SALVADOR<\/td>\n 72.643<\/td>\n 65.038<\/td>\n -10.47%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n VITORIA<\/td>\n 60.328<\/td>\n 44.652<\/td>\n -25.98%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\n 10<\/td>\n VILA DO CONDE<\/td>\n 46.305<\/td>\n 43.259<\/td>\n -6.58%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\n 11<\/td>\n PECEM<\/td>\n 33.982<\/td>\n 27.749<\/td>\n -18.34%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\n 12<\/td>\n FORTALEZA<\/td>\n 22.504<\/td>\n 19.398<\/td>\n -13.80%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\n 13<\/td>\n SUAPE<\/td>\n 22.960<\/td>\n 17.457<\/td>\n -23.97%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\n 14<\/td>\n NATAL<\/td>\n 17.970<\/td>\n 16.329<\/td>\n -9.13%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\n 15<\/td>\n MANAUS<\/td>\n 14.279<\/td>\n 13.482<\/td>\n -5.58%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\n 16<\/td>\n ITAGUAI<\/td>\n 20.535<\/td>\n 13.387<\/td>\n -34.81%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\n <\/td>\n OTHERS<\/td>\n 797<\/td>\n 511<\/td>\n -35.88%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\n <\/td>\n TOTAL<\/td>\n 2.415.064<\/td>\n 2.341.045<\/td>\n -3.06%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody> \n\n \n \n \n <\/table>\n\n<\/div>