{"id":38000,"date":"2023-03-01T16:40:46","date_gmt":"2023-03-01T19:40:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/datamarnews.com\/?post_type=noticias&p=38000"},"modified":"2023-03-15T17:05:22","modified_gmt":"2023-03-15T20:05:22","slug":"ports-ranking-dataliner-jan-dez-2022-vs-jan-dez-2021-brazil-and-plate","status":"publish","type":"noticias","link":"https:\/\/datamarnews.com\/noticias\/ports-ranking-dataliner-jan-dez-2022-vs-jan-dez-2021-brazil-and-plate\/","title":{"rendered":"Ports Ranking | DataLiner | Jan-Dez 2022 vs. Jan-Dez 2021 | Brazil and Plate"},"content":{"rendered":"

See below the ranking of Brazilian and Plate ports that most exported and imported containers from January to December 2022 with reference to the same period in 2021. The data is from DataLiner, Datamar’s business intelligence tool:<\/p>\n

Brazil<\/strong><\/h4>\n

The Port of Santos was the one that exported containerized cargo the most in 2022, 1,143,273 TEUs, a volume slightly higher than in 2021. The Port of Paranagu\u00e1, in turn, exported a volume 3.27% higher than the same period a year before. See more below:<\/p>\n

Ranking of Brazilian Ports | Exports | Jan-Dec 2021 vs. Jan-Dec 2022 | TEU<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n wdt_ID<\/th> Rank<\/th> Ports<\/th> Jan-Dec | 2021<\/th> Jan-Dec | 2022<\/th> % Change<\/th> <\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
1<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n SANTOS<\/td>\n 1.130.777<\/td>\n 1.143.273<\/td>\n 1.11%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n PARANAGUA<\/td>\n 393.865<\/td>\n 406.730<\/td>\n 3.27%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n NAVEGANTES<\/td>\n 387.612<\/td>\n 370.445<\/td>\n -4.43%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n ITAPOA<\/td>\n 188.772<\/td>\n 212.435<\/td>\n 12.54%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n RIO GRANDE<\/td>\n 212.515<\/td>\n 169.908<\/td>\n -20.05%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n RIO DE JANEIRO<\/td>\n 86.856<\/td>\n 85.511<\/td>\n -1.55%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n ITAJAI<\/td>\n 134.111<\/td>\n 81.730<\/td>\n -39.06%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\n 8<\/td>\n SALVADOR<\/td>\n 88.268<\/td>\n 77.612<\/td>\n -12.07%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n VITORIA<\/td>\n 71.613<\/td>\n 51.220<\/td>\n -28.48%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\n 10<\/td>\n VILA DO CONDE<\/td>\n 54.241<\/td>\n 49.506<\/td>\n -8.73%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\n 11<\/td>\n PECEM<\/td>\n 47.345<\/td>\n 35.152<\/td>\n -25.75%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\n 12<\/td>\n FORTALEZA<\/td>\n 27.947<\/td>\n 24.281<\/td>\n -13.12%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\n 13<\/td>\n NATAL<\/td>\n 23.734<\/td>\n 20.507<\/td>\n -13.60%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\n 14<\/td>\n SUAPE<\/td>\n 26.471<\/td>\n 19.545<\/td>\n -26.16%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\n 15<\/td>\n ITAGUAI<\/td>\n 24.387<\/td>\n 16.583<\/td>\n -32.00%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\n 16<\/td>\n MANAUS<\/td>\n 17.755<\/td>\n 16.127<\/td>\n -9.17%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\n <\/td>\n OTHERS<\/td>\n 891<\/td>\n 546<\/td>\n -38.72%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\n <\/td>\n TOTAL<\/td>\n 2.917.159<\/td>\n 2.781.112<\/td>\n -4.66%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody> \n\n \n \n \n <\/table>\n\n<\/div>