{"id":40077,"date":"2023-05-05T16:36:13","date_gmt":"2023-05-05T19:36:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/datamarnews.com\/?post_type=noticias&p=40077"},"modified":"2023-05-22T17:56:03","modified_gmt":"2023-05-22T20:56:03","slug":"ports-ranking-dataliner-jan-mar-2022-vs-jan-mar-2023-brazil-and-plate","status":"publish","type":"noticias","link":"https:\/\/datamarnews.com\/noticias\/ports-ranking-dataliner-jan-mar-2022-vs-jan-mar-2023-brazil-and-plate\/","title":{"rendered":"Ports Ranking | DataLiner | Jan-Mar 2022 vs. Jan-Mar 2023 | Brazil and Plate"},"content":{"rendered":"

See below the recently unveiled ranking of ports in Brazil and the Plate region (which encompasses Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay) in terms of containerized cargo handling during the first quarter of 2023 in comparison to the same period of the previous year. The data used to formulate the rankings below were gathered using DataLiner, Datamar’s cutting-edge business intelligence platform.<\/p>\n

Brazil<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Keeping its traditional score regarding containerized cargo exports, the Port of Santos ranked first in the 1st quarter of 2023, with 228,935 TEUs handled, a performance that reveals a 20.23% drop compared to the same period last year.<\/p>\n

The Port of Paranagu\u00e1, which ranked second in containerized cargo exports, handled 106,396 TEU between January and March this year, 11.22% more than in the same period last year. See more information in the table below:<\/p>\n

Ranking of Brazilian Ports | Exports | Jan-Mar 2022 vs. Jan-Mar 2023 | TEU<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n wdt_ID<\/th> Rank<\/th> Ports<\/th> Jan-Mar | 2022<\/th> Jan-Mar | 2023<\/th> % Change<\/th> <\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
1<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n SANTOS<\/td>\n 286.997<\/td>\n 228.935<\/td>\n -20.23%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n PARANAGUA<\/td>\n 95.666<\/td>\n 106.396<\/td>\n 11.22%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n NAVEGANTES<\/td>\n 98.004<\/td>\n 95.530<\/td>\n -2.52%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n ITAPOA<\/td>\n 47.483<\/td>\n 54.249<\/td>\n 14.25%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n RIO GRANDE<\/td>\n 44.458<\/td>\n 44.102<\/td>\n -0.80%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n SALVADOR<\/td>\n 19.171<\/td>\n 20.241<\/td>\n 5.58%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n RIO DE JANEIRO<\/td>\n 22.947<\/td>\n 16.848<\/td>\n -26.58%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\n 8<\/td>\n VILA DO CONDE<\/td>\n 13.314<\/td>\n 9.103<\/td>\n -31.62%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n VITORIA<\/td>\n 11.925<\/td>\n 8.390<\/td>\n -29.64%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\n 10<\/td>\n NATAL<\/td>\n 5.147<\/td>\n 7.554<\/td>\n 46.76%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\n 11<\/td>\n PECEM<\/td>\n 8.293<\/td>\n 4.540<\/td>\n -45.26%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\n 12<\/td>\n ITAGUAI<\/td>\n 4.035<\/td>\n 4.223<\/td>\n 4.66%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\n 13<\/td>\n SUAPE<\/td>\n 6.250<\/td>\n 4.010<\/td>\n -35.84%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\n 14<\/td>\n FORTALEZA<\/td>\n 7.234<\/td>\n 3.869<\/td>\n -46.52%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\n 15<\/td>\n MANAUS<\/td>\n 4.462<\/td>\n 3.472<\/td>\n -22.19%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\n 16<\/td>\n ITAJAI<\/td>\n 21.225<\/td>\n 142<\/td>\n -99.33%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\n <\/td>\n OTHERS<\/td>\n 197<\/td>\n 73<\/td>\n -62.94%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\n <\/td>\n TOTAL<\/td>\n 696.808<\/td>\n 611.677<\/td>\n -12.22%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody> \n\n \n \n \n <\/table>\n\n<\/div>